A Google user
I was reading an old interview by The Architectural Digest with Jon Krackauer, they had asked Jon what reading material he had carried on his climb up Everest, and the answer, awaited with tension, was" Infinite Jest". I had seen photos of Wallace, thought Jon would maybe read poetry on his rest stops on his total climb of 25,000 feet, in presence of very thin air, possibly Whitman. The interview was read early morning in the quiet and the book and Wallace appeared, again now at end of day, an omen to grab it in the morning, first thing!
A Google user
Obviously, based on the large number of very favourable reviews, I am in a vanishingly small minority who find "Infinite Jest" unsatisfying. For me, it's not that the book is difficult, it's that it's boring, and its characters are paper thin and uninteresting, and its humour is weak. Writers whom I enjoy accomplish that which Joseph Conrad laid out: "My task, which I am trying to achieve, is, by the power of the written word, to make you hear, to make you feel -- it is, before all, to make you *see*. If I succeed you shall find there according to your deserts: encouragement, consolation, fear, charm -- all you demand; and, perhaps, also that glimpse of truth for which you have forgotten to ask."
Anna Willoughby
This work I've heard described as both impenetrable and genius. I think it's in need of editing. There are some passages that are interesting and the imagery is sometimes beginning to verge on compelling, a different and intricate voice attempting to develop, but it reads as a first draft. A lot of things are written in a way that some, I think, mistake for deliberately confusing but seems to me like the kinds of narrative mistakes editors were invented to avoid.
8 people found this review helpful