War in Social Thought: Hobbes to the Present

Princeton University Press
Free sample

This book, the first of its kind, provides a sweeping critical history of social theories about war and peace from Hobbes to the present. Distinguished social theorists Hans Joas and Wolfgang Knöbl present both a broad intellectual history and an original argument as they trace the development of thinking about war over more than 350 years--from the premodern era to the period of German idealism and the Scottish and French enlightenments, and then from the birth of sociology in the nineteenth century through the twentieth century. While focusing on social thought, the book draws on many disciplines, including philosophy, anthropology, and political science.

Joas and Knöbl demonstrate the profound difficulties most social thinkers--including liberals, socialists, and those intellectuals who could be regarded as the first sociologists--had in coming to terms with the phenomenon of war, the most obvious form of large-scale social violence. With only a few exceptions, these thinkers, who believed deeply in social progress, were unable to account for war because they regarded it as marginal or archaic, and on the verge of disappearing. This overly optimistic picture of the modern world persisted in social theory even in the twentieth century, as most sociologists and social theorists either ignored war and violence in their theoretical work or tried to explain it away. The failure of the social sciences and especially sociology to understand war, Joas and Knöbl argue, must be seen as one of the greatest weaknesses of disciplines that claim to give a convincing diagnosis of our times.

Read more

About the author

Hans Joas is professor of sociology and social thought at the University of Chicago and a permanent fellow at the Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies at the University of Freiburg. Wolfgang Knöbl is professor of sociology at Göttingen University. They are the authors of many books and the coauthors of Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures.
Read more


2 total

Additional Information

Princeton University Press
Read more
Published on
Nov 4, 2012
Read more
Read more
Read more
Read more
History / Military / General
History / Social History
Philosophy / General
Philosophy / History & Surveys / General
Social Science / Sociology / General
Social Science / Violence in Society
Read more
Content Protection
This content is DRM protected.
Read more
Read Aloud
Available on Android devices
Read more
Eligible for Family Library

Reading information

Smartphones and Tablets

Install the Google Play Books app for Android and iPad/iPhone. It syncs automatically with your account and allows you to read online or offline wherever you are.

Laptops and Computers

You can read books purchased on Google Play using your computer's web browser.

eReaders and other devices

To read on e-ink devices like the Sony eReader or Barnes & Noble Nook, you'll need to download a file and transfer it to your device. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders.
"My new favorite book of all time." --Bill Gates

"A terrific book...[Pinker] recounts the progress across a broad array of metrics, from health to wars, the environment to happiness, equal rights to quality of life." --The New York Times

If you think the world is coming to an end, think again. Steven Pinker presents the big picture of human progress: people are living longer, healthier, freer, and happier lives, and while our problems are formidable, the solutions lie in the Enlightenment ideal of using reason and science.

Is the world really falling apart? Is the ideal of progress obsolete? In this elegant assessment of the human condition in the third millennium, cognitive scientist and public intellectual Steven Pinker urges us to step back from the gory headlines and prophecies of doom, which play to our psychological biases. Instead, follow the data: In seventy-five jaw-dropping graphs, Pinker shows that life, health, prosperity, safety, peace, knowledge, and happiness are on the rise, not just in the West, but worldwide. This progress is not the result of some cosmic force. It is a gift of the Enlightenment: the conviction that reason and science can enhance human flourishing.

Far from being a naïve hope, the Enlightenment, we now know, has worked. But more than ever, it needs a vigorous defense. The Enlightenment project swims against currents of human nature--tribalism, authoritarianism, demonization, magical thinking--which demagogues are all too willing to exploit. Many commentators, committed to political, religious, or romantic ideologies, fight a rearguard action against it. The result is a corrosive fatalism and a willingness to wreck the precious institutions of liberal democracy and global cooperation.

With intellectual depth and literary flair, Enlightenment Now makes the case for reason, science, and humanism: the ideals we need to confront our problems and continue our progress.
Bachelorarbeit aus dem Jahr 2009 im Fachbereich BWL - Sonstiges, Note: 3, Campus02 Fachhochschule der Wirtschaft Graz, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Im den letzten Jahrzehnten wurde die Bewertung von Patenten als Unternehmenswert zunehmend wichtiger. Vor allem die Valuierung der monetären Werte eines Patents bietet hier ein breites Spektrum an Möglichkeiten. Die Zielsetzung dieser Arbeit liegt in der Darstellung der Vorteile einer speziellen Methode genannt apud – Modell für Klein- und Mittelbetriebe. Um dies möglich zu machen werden zunächst die Vor- und Nachteile der retrospektiven Valuierungs- und Evaluierungsmethoden dargestellt und darauf Bezug genommen. Die Arbeit basiert auf Recherchearbeiten, welche im Zeitraum von Dezember 2008 bis April 2009 stattfanden und auf Interviews welche in diesem Zeitraum geführt wurden. Das Ergebnis zeigt ein nicht direkt monetär interpretierbares Ergebnis des apud - Modells welches allerdings auf eine breite Anwendbarkeit und damit auf Flexibilität für Unternehmen setzt. Abstract The area of patents has become increasingly important for companies over the last number of decades. Especially the patent valuation offered a lot of possibilities so far. It is the aim of this study to outline the advantage of one method called APUD for small and medium sized companies, in contrast to the broad set of scientific methods which already exist. To do this, this study focuses on the group of bottom-up valuation and other evaluation methods where the advantages and disadvantages got compared to the APUD method. In order to do that information was collected over a 4 month period between December 2008 and March 2009. The study is based on the information obtained from the research and on interviews done during that time. The advantages and disadvantages are shown for the so called classical methods as well as for the APUD method. The result makes that the APUD method provides a value which is not a monetary one and is based on a broad set of evaluation criterions. Therefore it can be used in different cases, what provides flexibility for the companies.
Bachelorarbeit aus dem Jahr 2010 im Fachbereich VWL - Innovationsökonomik, Note: 1, Campus02 Fachhochschule der Wirtschaft Graz, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Zusammenfassung Die Bewertung von Technologien ist für Unternehmen von entscheidender Bedeutung. Um daraus strategische Schritte ableiten zu können, ist vorab aber eine Positionierung innerhalb des Lebenszyklus einer Technologie notwendig. In dieser Arbeit werden die grundsätzlichen Begriffe erklärt und auf verschiedene Modelle zur Technologieprognose eingegangen. Der Fokus liegt hierbei auf dem S-Kurven Konzept von McKinsey, welches auch im entwickelten Vorgehensmodell Eingang findet. Für das Modell erfolgen die Erarbeitung des Zusammenhangs mit dem Begriff Reifegrad, sowie die Erklärung der grundsätzlichen Einordnung von Vorgehensmodellen. Das erarbeitete Vorgehensmodell bietet die Möglichkeit der Positionierung und kann als Ausgangspunkt für weitere Schritte bezogen auf Technologieentscheidungen dienen. Abstract Assessment of technologies is a major cornerstone for companies. This thesis focuses on the positioning inside a technology life cycle. Further to this strategic steps can be taken for the future. Research is based on general terms and the explanation of models used for predicting technology evolutions. Different types are reviewed with the focus on the S-curve concept from McKinsey. This concept is also a part of the developed procedure model. The procedure model section gives an insight into the degree of maturity as well as the general positioning of procedure models. The research shows that with this procedure model it is possible to evaluate the phase of a technology lifecycle. We can conclude from the survey that this could be used for further steps within the technology management.
©2018 GoogleSite Terms of ServicePrivacyDevelopersArtistsAbout Google
By purchasing this item, you are transacting with Google Payments and agreeing to the Google Payments Terms of Service and Privacy Notice.