Wow.. that's way too expensive 4.99 gbp for an issue! And is a subscription any cheaper? Who can tell? I wouldn't dare hit the subscribe button to try to look. Similar magazines lists crochet today. Says it all about the quality of Google search these days...
Online/physical copy price balance is wrong The content is not the issue: it's interesting. Deliver online copy that uses IT well (links to relevant files and other resources - adds value BECAUSE it's delivered online ) and I'll pay the equivalent print price. I will continue to buy the magazine in-store. But treating online copy as if it were paper-based is crass.
The price is wrong. Does it cost only £1 to print and distribute the printed version of the magazine, to justify £4 for the digital content?
Great magazine. Terrible price. No incentive to switch to digital. It doesn't warrant the one star reviews as the content is great. It really does need to be cheaper through the play store than a real copy though.
A great tech magazine Well written and surprisingly diverse. I'll be buying another issue next month and at $6.99 it is cheaper than the newsstand. January's issue is loaded with web design tips, examples, editorials by experts that know what they're talking about. My only gripe is that Google's app doesn't allow for copy and paste, searching, or linking URLs features I consider important in a tech magazine. I can't fault the publisher for Google's flaws.
Waste of money Free trial? Yeah right why have I been charged the full price?? Only wanted to try it out to see if I read the electronic version better with my SpLD as opposed to the paper version, ridiculous!!