![](https://play-lh.googleusercontent.com/a/ACg8ocLGDUmtOuLT_Uo50qJti7_rrUb_lxXkVVwTEa88SBHzpLRs-1oB=s32-mo)
Joshua Rice
We would like to inquire about the timeline for implementing a more consistent approach to your hosting costs. It would be greatly appreciated if we could receive increased transparency with regular updates. We would like to see an update that focuses on enhancing the user experience for all players, rather than relying on antiquated pay-to-win models and unattainable objectives. The intervals between "competitions" are excessively long, suggesting a deficiency in creativity and innovation.
1 person found this review helpful
![](https://play-lh.googleusercontent.com/a/ACg8ocIsB6wHPtUy4zl1tLrXPNQoGoygtzysNelo0baORu0kVXpJqg=s32-mo)
Yannick
Gameplay itself is ok, but the progression and regards system is awful. Not satisfying to progress, not many options to work towards, and takes very long if you're not paying. The game boasts many ability and weapon combinations, but realistically you're very limited. Even after only a few hours, it's easy to tell which weapons are far superior to others. Would skip this one until a major overhaul is done to progression and customization.
23 people found this review helpful
![](https://play-lh.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-UjXIkSpnK7aKj87LTK8d4geNU7muukZ1l7IGKOAyAzJwZ3PsZPU4=s32)
Adam G
I like the concept a lot. Seems like a decent amount of builds you can come up with, though I'm sure there's an optimal few out there. However, matchmaking is either scammy or broken. I notice that I'm constantly the lowest-trophy-score "player" of the 6 and that most of the other spots are filled by obvious bots. Also, matches often seem jusssst out of reach, despite my best efforts, making it feel like you're designed to lose until suddenly, you blow through one no problem to "catch up." 3of5
22 people found this review helpful