Nicholas Gimbrone (Nick)
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
Crowd sourced research for science matters, making this a great app... that said, as an app it is less then sterling. The most glaring "missing" or "broken" aspects are: (1) that the notifications are useless, no ability to click one to see which image it is talking about and that the number of them seems unrelated to reality (I get hundreds more than I have pictures taken); (2) an "delay uploads of reports until next connected to wifi"; (3) that videos seem to never be accepted or rejected; (4) that jpg files are stored in DCIM rather than a subfolder; (5) I so far have not figured out where videos are stored, seems like with Camera they should be in the same location as the jpg files.
31 people found this review helpful
Lesley Sackville
Just installed tonight so the jury is still out but I'm confused already. I thought a good place to start was with my profile. I selected edit, and tried to add a pix, like a profile pix, it let me choose it but won't upload it. Not a good start! Hopefully the functionality of the app will improve tomorrow when I'm out running errands and perhaps finding opportunities to add pictures of the little guys! Stars will be added when things improve!
2 people found this review helpful
A Google user
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
App is a bit clunky but they're working on it (it's a research project and I applaud the effort). App developer is responsive to emails. One potential improvement would be to use EXIF data or photo geotags to place images on the map. Right now it appears they post where uploaded, not where captured. Another idea might be use a heatmap to display sighting frequency and overlay markers at a closer zoom level.
52 people found this review helpful
Mount St. Joseph University
June 12, 2019
Hi Thomas! Thank you for the feedback. This issue should be fixed in the latest version. The location will now be based on where the image was taken. Thank you for reaching out!