Experimenter

2015 • 98 minutes
3,8
495 avis
85%
Tomatometer
Interdit aux moins de 13 ans
Classification
Admissible
Regarder dans un navigateur Web ou sur les appareils pris en charge En savoir plus
La bande sonore et les sous-titres ne sont pas offerts dans votre langue. Les sous-titres sont disponibles dans les langues suivantes : Anglais.

À propos de ce film

Yale University, 1961. Stanley Milgram (Peter Sarsgaard) designs a psychology experiment that remains relevant to this day, in which people think they’re delivering painful electric shocks to an affable stranger (Jim Gaffigan) strapped into a chair in another room. Disregarding his pleas for mercy, the majority of subjects do not stop the experiment, administering what they think are near-fatal electric shots, simply because they’ve been told to. Milgram’s exploration of authority and conformity strikes a nerve in popular culture and the scientific community. Celebrated in some circles, he is also accused of being a deceptive, manipulative monster. His wife Sasha (Winona Ryder) anchors him through it all.
Classification
Interdit aux moins de 13 ans

Notes et avis

3,8
495 avis
Rigoberto Ramirez
8 novembre 2015
Love the style of this film - taking what could have been a dry presentation of his very important work and life and made it into a very absorbing and visually eye-catching film. Even though his work was done in the 70's and he passed away in1984, his work is still incredibly relevant today! Peter Sarsgaard & Winona Ryder are both incredible - and it's good to see Winona slowly creeping back into films and doing such stunning work.
Avez-vous trouvé cette information utile?
Jeff Shellow
24 octobre 2015
But what is truly fascinating, and ill obviously speak on it witout spoiling it, is that I feel very strongly the true signifigance (these experiments being real) is how the experiment itself and thus the scientist would be so,in a sense, villafied , which speaks volumes in its own right about how so resistant to personally admitting we as a species, would be susceptible to what is depicted ,that we must find fault within the process ie debunking the results. Idki just food for thought ...give her a watch
Avez-vous trouvé cette information utile?
Peyton Reed
6 février 2016
A non traditional and dry route to the wetlands of desire and hopes to an immortality as an individual, it appear and be such in this underated tale of truths. People lusting for deceit, falsity, sarcastic echoes of a reflection inside a house of mirrors, for pleasure over another [It must be a real story]. The cast seemingly in tune to roles perspectives. And yet again, flawless, it seem Mr Saasgard has become onto us. Congrats.
Avez-vous trouvé cette information utile?

Noter ce film

Faites-nous part de votre avis.