YouTube yoki Google TV orqali filmlarni ijaraga oling yoki xarid qiling
Endi filmlarni Google Play orqali xarid qilish imkonsiz

Eye in the Sky

2016 • 102 daqiqa
4,0
248 ta sharh
95%
Tomatometer
14A (14 yoshgacha, faqat kattalar bilan)
Reyting
Yaroqli
Tilingiz uchun audio va taglavha yo‘q. Taglavhalar mazkur tillar uchun bor: inglizcha.

Bu film haqida

Colonel Katherine Powell is a UK-based military officer in command of a top secret drone operation to capture terrorists in Kenya. Powell discovers the targets are planning a suicide bombing and the mission escalates from “capture” to “kill.” But as American pilot Steve Watts is about to engage, a nine-year old girl enters the kill zone triggering an international dispute over the moral, political, and personal implications of modern warfare.
Yoshga oid cheklov
14A (14 yoshgacha, faqat kattalar bilan)

Reytinglar va sharhlar

4,0
248 ta sharh
Just Visiting
30-iyun, 2016
A little girl, who has the full right to live, finds herself in the way of a war which must be fought. The director could not have done a better job if he wanted to show us how extraordinarily pathetic is the Western response to terrorism. Men in ties and women in pants sitting at a table with coffee and biscuits thousands of miles away from the mission's objective, who keep putting off the job while they fight over commas, legalese and the meaning of collateral damage, are soon joined in their moralistic confusion by two "pilots" sitting in a hangar, who question the order before the order is given, and who start crying at the thought of releasing their weapon. On the one hand, if democracies had fought this way against Hitler, there is no doubt that today we would all be speaking German; there would be no nation of Israel; and Jews would exist only in museums or in the form of lamp shades. On the other hand, that little girl is precisely why we have imposed a straight jacket on people in uniform with guns and drones.
5 kishi bu sharhni foydali deb topgan
Buni foydasi tegdimi?
Mark Evans
10-iyul, 2016
If they'd left out the flying beetle and hummingbird camera scenes, which would be better off in a James Bond or Mission Impossible film, and come up with a different means to discover what's inside the house, it would be more believable. Also, the use of the cute little girl seemed to be very manipulative of the audience. The entire moral quandary they face seems to hinge on potentially killing an innocent girl, at the expense of examining bigger moral questions.
Buni foydasi tegdimi?
Tanya Stepanic
28-yanvar, 2017
It was a bit slow to start, although necessary while building the plot, but kept me at the edge of my seat, and finally broke my heart... An emotional roller coaster!
Buni foydasi tegdimi?

Bu filmni baholang

Fikringizni bildiring.