jay jarrah
- پرچمگذاری بهعنوان نامناسب
- نمایش سابقه مرور
Spoiler alert: I just can't fathom the idea of saving one friend could end up killing an entire city with all its majesty. I am probably looking solely on the very surface of this movie - still I don't find it that deep either. Too long and the idea is overused - Doesn't even feel like its connected to the previous ones.
SharkFireChief
- پرچمگذاری بهعنوان نامناسب
- نمایش سابقه مرور
I loved it but a 4 because Teresa should have died by Thomas hand, honestly. think about this, if someone betrayed you and your friends resulting in having to free them and losing some of them in the process would you not want them gone. also if she didn't betray them don't you think Mary would have figured out that Thomas blood is the CURE when she realized that Brenda was cured. because of Teresa's betrayal Mary was killed. think about that.
۵۵ نفر این مرور را مفید دانستهاند
AJ Walker
- پرچمگذاری بهعنوان نامناسب
The first movie was good, the second movie was merely "ok" but this final film was absolute garbage. Too many plot holes and deus ex machina moments in this film. People appear out of nowhere, figure stuff out without sufficient clues, poor attempts at jump scare, and a protagonist who can't seem to figure out anything beyond what the writers tell him to do. Thomas is the sole "cure" for the zombie making disease and Teresa is the only one who can synthesis an antidote but eh, RIP humanity so we can all go live near the beach is how this film ends. Horrible writing and I wish I hadn't spent my money on this hot steaming pile of garbage. And if a person has to read the books to understand the films, the filmmakers failed at their jobs of making a compelling and coherent film.