Saving Private Ryan

1998年 • 169 分鐘
4.8
7580 則評論
94%
爛番茄新鮮度
R
分級
符合資格
透過網路瀏覽器或支援的裝置觀看 瞭解詳情
你的語言不支援音訊和字幕。支援字幕的語言:英文。

關於這部電影

Steven Spielberg directed this powerful, realistic re-creation of WWII's D-day
invasion and the immediate aftermath. The story opens with a prologue in which a veteran
brings his family to the American cemetery at Normandy, and a flashback then joins Capt.
John Miller (Tom Hanks) and GIs in a landing craft making the June 6, 1944, approach to
Omaha Beach to face devastating German artillery fire. This mass slaughter of American
soldiers is depicted in a compelling, unforgettable 24-minute sequence. Miller's men
slowly move forward to finally take a concrete pillbox. On the beach littered with
bodies is one with the name "Ryan" stenciled on his backpack. Army Chief of Staff Gen.
George C. Marshall (Harve Presnell), learning that three Ryan brothers from the same
family have all been killed in a single week, requests that the surviving brother, Pvt.
James Ryan (Matt Damon), be located and brought back to the United States. Capt. Miller
gets the assignment, and he chooses a translator, Cpl. Upham (Jeremy Davis), skilled in
language but not in combat, to join his squad of right-hand man Sgt. Horvath (Tom
Sizemore), plus privates Mellish (Adam Goldberg), Medic Wade (Giovanni Ribisi), cynical
Reiben (Edward Burns) from Brooklyn, Italian-American Caparzo (Vin Diesel), and
religious Southerner Jackson (Barry Pepper), an ace sharpshooter who calls on the Lord
while taking aim. Having previously experienced action in Italy and North Africa, the
close-knit squad sets out through areas still thick with Nazis. After they lose one man
in a skirmish at a bombed village, some in the group begin to question the logic of
losing more lives to save a single soldier. The film's historical consultant is Stephen
E. Ambrose, and the incident is based on a true occurance in Ambrose's 1994 bestseller
D-Day: June 6, 1944.
內容分級
R

評分和評論

4.8
7580 則評論
Jarrod Infante
2014年10月12日
Really good, moving story with great acting. But even though Hanks does great in his acting ability, he has been miscast. No one would believe that an Army Ranger would make the statement that Tom Hanks was "built out of the body parts of dead GI's...". Bruce Willis, Clint Eastwood (who would be to old to cast in this part, but still...), maybe Gerard Butler... But no one would say that about Tom Hanks.
4 位使用者認為這則評論有幫助
jon Mitchell
2015年4月1日
Fury has a much better plot, I'm not %100 convinced they would've went threw this much hell to save one guy, but otherwise a good job. Fury was much more realistic about what these men were like and what they felt mentally as they fought to stay alive.
1 位使用者認為這則評論有幫助
Nathan Lipscomb
2018年6月24日
Excellent portrayal of a small unit cohesion ! Only pitfall, was trying to imagine a Matt Damon going through ranger school ! Spielberg has to use what is available , I understand ! Maybe Hollywood should employ out of work military veteran's in these war movies! Just a thought!