Star Trek Into Darkness

2013 • 132 minutes

About this movie

J.J. Abrams' STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS is the best-reviewed blockbuster of the year. When a ruthless mastermind known as Khan (Benedict Cumberbatch) declares a one-man war on the Federation, Captain Kirk (Chris Pine), Spock (Zachary Quinto), and the daring crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise will embark on the greatest manhunt in history. It will take all of their skills and teamwork to defend Earth and eliminate Khan’s threat in this “sleek, thrilling epic.” (Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly)

Ratings and reviews

What a horrible piece of Non Star Trek. They didn't set bother to this movie up, they have never encountered Khan before and have no history of antagonism . The movie falls off a cliff with Bones & Jim. About as good as other JJ Abrams masterpiece "The Rise of Skywalker." Watch Wrath of Khan instead. At least that movie makes sense. This movie gave me a headache. Star Trek has never recovered from this dumpster fire

A lot of people are complaining that this movie is just the Kelvin Timeline version of Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan. And you know what, they're right. However, it's still incredible. It can't match the original Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan (nothing ever can), but Star Trek Into Darkness is still a damn good movie, especially Pine and Cumberbatch's performances. The only bad thing about this film is that Buckaroo Banzi turns out to be one of the bad guys (BB fans will know who I mean).

This entire movie was phenomenal, it focused on the other characters other than Spock and Kirk and really developed the characters well. The only problem was the ending of the movie using music to kill drones in space. The entire movie was a 10 except the end which crashed and burned and was utterly ridiculous which is why we don't have a Star Trek 4