Michael Giordano
I absolutely love Stargate, and have watched everything connected to the IP. I grew up on a (un)healthy diet of SG1, and I was thrilled to see the IP put something else out. Pros: it's Stargate, and while campy, it's fun and even plays with System Lord politics in a way even the SG1 rarely captured. It also had Ra's ship from the original film which was a cool addition. Cons: It disrupted the cannon timeline, and the way they put it back together was patchwork at best. It was the level of campy I expect from Dr. Who, but Stargate (especially as it got more advanced) has always been a bit more gritty.
Phobos
- Նշել որպես անպատշաճ
- Ցուցադրել կարծիքի պատմությունը
Like everything else that came before it in the franchise it has it's own
flavor. Mostly consistent with existing canon and it tries to tie up loose
ends, but SG1 did more retconing of the original movie than Origins does in
general, plus there's plenty within the tv canon that contradicts itself so
I don't mind too much. A fun adventure with good characters and great
callbacks. Glad we finally have more Stargate and hope things only get
better and they give us more of the answers to questions we've been asking
for years.
Stephen Townsley
- Նշել որպես անպատշաճ
- Ցուցադրել կարծիքի պատմությունը
Obviously a low budget but nevertheless a watchable movie for fans. In
places a bit cheesey and somewhat pandering to the idea that the female
lead must drive the story. SG1 was more an essemble piece and better for
it. The British officer accent was a bit pompous. Probably was in 1938.
Jarring but maybe accurate. Don't know how they powered the gate with a car
battery. The movie was rather the same as Rogue One to Star Wars. A related
story rather than a main theme. I wondered if she broke cartouche was the
one later found by Daniel Jackson. Dark in places. Indiana Jones echo with
the Nazi theme. Overall a good one off to keep Stargate breathing in 2018.