Dan Parr
After these two years, I realize why critics gave it a 53% rating. In 2014, I didn't get why they gave it such a bad rating, and I actually really liked the film. However, after seeing it again, I realize why people give it hate, the execution of the villains and the plot was rushed, and Rhino had potential which they wasted and he was in there for two minutes. Spider Man 3's villains had a reason to team up against Spidey, Hob-Goblin and Electro did not! The plot is rushed too, what a waste.
36 people found this review helpful
Joshua Channell
While the first of the new movies was average this takes the averageness and becomes more average. Peter Parker is more of a stalker than in the previous movie, there's a lot of missed opportunities (such as the introduction to Black Cat rather than a brief name drop of her real name), as well as the execution of Electro and the plot. This can easily be compared to Spider-Man 3, which is significantly better as it gave the characters reasons to team up against Spider-Man. This movie sucks in comparison.
4 people found this review helpful
callum capon
The spiderman franchise with toby maguire were a grat hit. Andrew garfield took to the spot in 2012 with the surprise of choice of villian the Lizard. It had a steady story and good action. This one has kind lost track because harry osborn failed completely because he is the hob goblin not green. Rhino was metal he was only in it for 2 mins. And electro was ok just weak story. And poor ending for emma stone/gwen stacey.
23 people found this review helpful