Glen Medrano
- Подаване на сигнал за неуместност
- Показване на историята на отзивите
Let me just point out that the premise of Angry Birds was never centred towards children. However, this film takes a step too far by not fixing the first film's problems. Just like the first film, the plot was bland, jokes were dry, characters were still obnoxious, and it still had way too many curse-word substitutes and innuendos. It also forces agendas to kids. This movie deserves a PG-13 rating. This movie is an insult to the classic mobile game and ruins the characters for all generations.
cuponia
- Подаване на сигнал за неуместност
- Показване на историята на отзивите
And now a point of view from a growing child...i hate it. There is alot of adult humour in it. There is a romance, beer, and tight clothes on the pigs. I took it off and was traumatized. Even my mom agrees and banned me from watching this movie. My mom is a good mom and this was the first time i was banned from doing something. Its more pg-13...wait...no...RATED R! Plus this movie is very cringy and ruins the characters. Dont watch it. Please. First movie was better.
21 души сметнаха този отзив за полезен
John Weemhoff
- Подаване на сигнал за неуместност
Chuck's sister and the leader of the pigs are the funniest characters in this movie, should have had more of her. If You're expecting Red to be the center of the humour and action, you're sadly mistaken. The first movie focused on Red as a first person view point, and humor came from his situations. In this movie Red takes a backseat to the action going around him as it's definitely a 3rd person view point. If you're okay with that, there was some funny stuff caused by the other characters.
74 души сметнаха този отзив за полезен