Milton Lau
It is okay, given much of the content is from a one sided perspective. For example, if we sent semiautonomous robots to begin building an artificial mountain, they could "work" on their own for as long as it takes to build it. The objective is to build a plateau just short of Low Mars Orbit, so visitors can land safely, and leave safely. Eventually a proper mechanized Space Elevator would be installed to enable more efficiency in the comings and goings. Then the danger element would be elimin
D L
From the beginning the "acting" falls like a lead weight into a supermassive black hole. It's atrocious and you couldn't care less about the smug self-satisfied expressions on their faces. Human arrogance at its finest. Twaddle like this is the reason we can justify genocide against our fellow Earthlings who don't happen to share our DNA blueprint, endless natural resource theft, habit destruction, over-hunting and fishing, and limitless human population growth.
142 people found this review helpful
Salvatore Conti
Sort of ok... some good imagery. Depressing though. The very people ignoring climate change and not giving a hoot about Humanity, the starving, the poor; these very people, wealthy enough to build their privatized rockets and refusing to pay their share, are espousing our need to get to Mars so we can 'save the human race'. I find the irony painful. Unbearable. As long as we, Humanity, ignore what needs being done here, on Earth, I find this series periphrastic, and a narcissistic plight of a corporate and plebeian mindset. Gold on Mars? What's the real hook?
112 people found this review helpful