
A Google user
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
Great checkers game. I hope you might consider making the level of the computer opponent adjustable by using an ELO rating ranging from 200 to 2400. If this is more work than it's worth, would you consider adding difficulty adjustment by fixed depth in addition to fixed time as you already do, to bridge the gap between random play and that 1st second, and make your excellent apps more accessible to people who are just starting out.
5 people found this review helpful

A Google user
The game's interface is minimalist and fresh. I'm not too interested in CPUs/AIs in checkers, so I won't comment on that. However, I value multilayer mode. One suggestion: Slow down the animations. Because of the high speed of the animations, when introducing checkers to people, I'm stuck having to explain why a piece just seemingly teleported horizontally across the board, disappearing with a handful of pieces. Otherwise, allow players to input every jump till the end of the jump sequence.
6 people found this review helpful

A Google user
Update: you're right Aart I was being unfair. I'm no beginner and I do win the very occasional game. But the easiest level, (not random) is in my opinion, too hard. There is no possibility of my moving through the levels. Great programming though.
4 people found this review helpful
Aart Bik
December 12, 2018
Thanks for still giving a good rating! May I suggest playing a few moves at the random level and, when you are ahead a few stones, switch back to a regular level to try to win. Hopefully it will improve your game after a while.