The Supreme Court and the NCAA: The Case for Less Commercialism and More Due Process in College Sports

· University of Michigan Press · AI ບັນຍາຍໂດຍ Mike (ຈາກ Google)
5,0
1 ຄຳຕິຊົມ
ປຶ້ມສຽງ
8 ຊົ່ວໂມງ 26 ນາທີ
ສະບັບເຕັມ
ບັນຍາຍໂດຍ AI
ຕ້ອງການຕົວຢ່າງ 50 ນາທີ ຟຣີບໍ? ຟັງໄດ້ທຸກເວລາ,​ ເຖິງແມ່ນໃນເວລາອອບລາຍຢູ່ກໍຕາມ. 
ເພີ່ມ

ກ່ຽວກັບປຶ້ມອ່ານອອກສຽງ

Two Supreme Court decisions, NCAA v. Board of Regents (1984) and NCAA v. Tarkanian (1988), shaped college sports by permitting the emergence of a commercial enterprise with high financial stakes, while failing to guarantee adequate procedural protections for persons charged with wrongdoing within that enterprise. Brian L. Porto examines the conditions that led to the cases, the reasoning behind the rulings, and the consequences of those rulings. He proposes a federal statute that would grant the NCAA a limited "educational exemption" from antitrust laws, enabling it to enhance academic opportunities for athletes and affording greater procedural protections to accused parties in NCAA disciplinary proceedings.

ການຈັດອັນດັບ ແລະ ຄຳຕິຊົມ

5,0
1 ຄຳຕິຊົມ

ກ່ຽວກັບຜູ້ຂຽນ

Brian Porto is Professor of Law at Vermont Law School and a lawyer in private practice.


ໃຫ້ຄະແນນປຶ້ມສຽງນີ້

ບອກພວກເຮົາວ່າທ່ານຄິດແນວໃດ.

ຂໍ້ມູນການຟັງ

ສະມາດໂຟນ ແລະ ແທັບເລັດ
ຕິດຕັ້ງ ແອັບ Google Play Books ສຳລັບ Android ແລະ iPad/iPhone. ມັນຊິ້ງຂໍ້ມູນໂດຍອັດຕະໂນມັດກັບບັນຊີຂອງທ່ານ ແລະ ອະນຸຍາດໃຫ້ທ່ານອ່ານທາງອອນລາຍ ຫຼື ແບບອອບລາຍໄດ້ ບໍ່ວ່າທ່ານຈະຢູ່ໃສ.
ແລັບທັອບ ແລະ ຄອມພິວເຕີ
ທ່ານສາມາດອ່ານປຶ້ມທີ່ຊື້ຜ່ານ Google Play ໂດຍໃຊ້ໂປຣແກຣມທ່ອງເວັບຂອງຄອມພິວເຕີໄດ້.