The Supreme Court and the NCAA: The Case for Less Commercialism and More Due Process in College Sports

· University of Michigan Press · AI 朗讀:Mike (來自 Google)
5.0
1 則評論
有聲書
8 小時 26 分鐘
完整足本
AI 朗讀
想免費試聽 50 分鐘?隨時聆聽,離線亦可 
新增

關於這本有聲書

Two Supreme Court decisions, NCAA v. Board of Regents (1984) and NCAA v. Tarkanian (1988), shaped college sports by permitting the emergence of a commercial enterprise with high financial stakes, while failing to guarantee adequate procedural protections for persons charged with wrongdoing within that enterprise. Brian L. Porto examines the conditions that led to the cases, the reasoning behind the rulings, and the consequences of those rulings. He proposes a federal statute that would grant the NCAA a limited "educational exemption" from antitrust laws, enabling it to enhance academic opportunities for athletes and affording greater procedural protections to accused parties in NCAA disciplinary proceedings.

評分和評論

5.0
1 則評論

關於作者

Brian Porto is Professor of Law at Vermont Law School and a lawyer in private practice.


為這本有聲書評分

請分享你的寶貴意見。

聆聽資訊

智能手機和平板電腦
請安裝 Android 版iPad/iPhone 版「Google Play 圖書」應用程式。這個應用程式會自動與你的帳戶保持同步,讓你隨時隨地上網或離線閱讀。
手提電腦和電腦
你可以使用電腦的網頁瀏覽器閱讀從 Google Play 購買的書籍。