How Goddesses Are Turned Into Logs: World History Of Turning Women Into Mats

Andrey Davydov · Olga Skorbatyuk

Aug 2014 · A Log With Legs Spread Wide Book 2 · HPA Press

About this ebook

Every woman considers herself an individual. In vain, as regardless of race, ethnicity, profession and so on, no woman is an individual. Every woman lives as man programmed her to live, as it is convenient for him, as he wants her to. Women do not even suspect who produces images for what they consider their "Self," and why.

By studying the history of world culture (literature, pictorial art, architecture, music, science, etc.), it is easy to trace that men usurped everything that had to do with images, as ideas for creation of anything. And, from time immemorial, women were left with a role of stupid consumers, and performers, and it was made sure that women think that they (women) are creators too. But, women did not participate in the birth of any product, which begins with a sketch, and in turn a sketch begins with an idea, and an idea begins with an image. Yes, women weaved, embroidered, painted cloth, and sometimes sewed. But, based on sketches made by whom? Based on sketches and patterns created by men. The essence of this process is to forbid women from creating images, and under any excuse to never allow women to do it, ever. Excuses used are from rudest and degenerative ("What are you trying to do, you fool? Go make me a sandwich instead," or "Do you not hear your baby crying?”), to the most romantic and poetic ("You are my muse, just be near, inspire me, you are so beautiful!"). 

Men’s intent is simple: to have total control over the psyche and the physiology of any woman because an image is the basis of functioning of any person. Providing an image to a woman ensures that she will live and function strictly according to this image. Also, an image is the basis for control of any person, as well as the basis of knowledge about her/him.

Men create images. Therefore, they know exactly what image is behind this or that behavior of a woman. In other words, they know how she will think, act, present herself, what she will want, strive for and seek (from men as well). So, a woman does not even suspect that she is like an open book for any man, even if he sees her for the first time.

But, women are sure that images that they use (including for construction of their "Self-Image," that they consider their individuality) are a secret. Borrowing images that were made up by men from cultural sources, and using them to form her personality, her way of life, any woman strongly believes in her unrepeatability, originality, and uncognizability. What do you think, who gave women this assurance, and why?

In other words, men achieved what they wanted: from potential goddesses, women were made into logs, a resource, a consumable material from which a man can make whatever he likes. Men use women for all and any of their needs. 

Today, women are allowed everything, even to pretend that they create images too. Only women are not aware that they make their creations solely on the basis of those artificial images, which have already been thought up by men, and have been put into women for centuries, from generation to generation, in the process of "domestication." Women are celebrating victory, but none of them wonder why, for example, a couple of centuries ago there were no women filmmakers, litterateurs, painters, scientists or politicians? Or, why in the history of humans their percentage ratio is so low? Or, how many prime ministers there were before Margaret Thatcher and what was their gender? Or, in what century there was the first female president? And so on. Even a quick historical review, readily available statistics make it clear that women are allowed only into already constructed and functioning system built by men. And, women are allowed to act only based on and within images that the system dictates.

Women lost the "war between the sexes." Since the time of birth women are being made into logs with legs spread wide, as an indication of their main purpose—to participate in the reproduction of the human race, and be pleasant toys in the hands of men. Most important is to not forget to tell women, who "love through their ears," that they are wonderful, priceless, how much men love them and depend on them. Long ago women were programmed to believe in any nonsense, instead of seeing and analyzing facts (as well as history).

 

Ratings and reviews

I am a man and a person whom seeks facts not inaccurate fantasies I think you need to rethink your strategies on how you write your books and I really just have one fact that I want to share with you that I think you will find interesting and kind of throws both of your books at least in the sense of their "summaries" lol Women are statistically smarter than men it is a genetic fact of how our and for that matter most species of animals are and there is a reason for this and it is as follows: The job in the relationship in primitive man was to hunt and gather giving them strength stamina and enough intelligence to build basic traps and tools but, The job of primitive woman was to test and prepare the the food to make sure it was safe to eat make clothes as well as other skills needed to help the next generation be born and grow into healthy adults and keep an eye out for and to an extent ward off predators giving them some strength but their quality skills genetically​ speaking are greater intelligence analytical skills and great servellence skills (where do you think the saying eyes behind your head came from, incase your still clueless it comes from these skills) In conclusion just based off of genetics women are smarter than men soooooo... You think that women need to be subjegated​ by the less intelligent gender hmm.... In my opinion that makes... No scene have a wonderful day bye By the way at a time no lawyers or filmmakers or comidians that were female is because if they said so much as a word of this they got ridiculed for doing it, it is not that men thought of it first, it's that women were not allowed to express there opinions soooo bye

just fine

Good and honest

About the author

Andrey Davydov is a Russian researcher and sinologist. He is the Research Supervisor at the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls and Partner with Human Population Academy. Davydov has discovered that Shan Hai Jing is the Catalog of human population and has created the Catalog of Human Souls based on decryption of Shan Hai Jing and other ancient books. He has authored over 300 books, as well as multiple scientific monographs, ideologies, and books on international topics. List of publications is available here - http://www.humanpopulationacademy.org/publications/. Davydov was born in Frunze, Kirghizia of former USSR (Kyrgyzstan) and raised in Moscow (Russia). In 2012 he was granted political asylum (http://www.humanpopulationacademy.org/publications/#documentation) in the United States of America due to persecution by the Federal Security Service of Russian Federation (FSB, former KGB).

Olga Skorbatyuk is a Senior Analyst at the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls and partner with Human Population Academy. Skorbatyuk is a professional psychologist, the founder of Non-Traditional Psychoanalysis, and Andrey Davydov’s research partner. She was granted political asylum as well.

HPA Press publishes works that further Human Population Academy’s mission: to inform over 7 billion humans living on Earth about the discovery of the Catalog of human population (Catalog of Human Souls). Human Population Academy‘s vision is a world where every person uses the Catalog of Human Souls. Visit HumanPopulationAcademy.org