That, Bolick demonstrates, is exactly the role the framers intended the courts to play, envisioning a judiciary deferential to proper democratic governance but bold in defense of freedom. But the historical record is painfully uneven. During the Warren era, courts protected freedom of speech and equal protection of the law but denigrated other important rights and took on executive and legislative powers that brought disrepute to the judiciary. The Rehnquist Court restored some balance, reining in judicial excesses and protecting property rights, but stopped far short of the activist judicial role the framers charted for the courts in policing conduct of other branches of government that exceeds constitutional boundaries. Bolick showcases numerous real-world examples of people whose rights to free speech, economic liberty, equal protection of the law, and private property were violated by government—victims of government oppression whose only recourse is the courts. David’s Hammer reclaims for the judiciary its intended role as the ultimate safeguard of a free society.
Clint Bolick is director of the Goldwater Center for Constitutional Litigation in Phoenix and is associated of-counsel with Rose Law Group in Scottsdale, Arizona. He previously served as president and general counsel at the Alliance for School Choice and was co-founder and litigation director of the Institute for Justice. He is the author of Voucher Wars: Waging the Legal Battle Over School Choice. Bolick also serves as a research fellow with the Hoover Institution.