The author has thoroughly studied the solution he advocates for many decades, both theoretically and practically. Theoretically as a trained chemical engineer and studies at university, in subjects such as philosophy, mathematics, history of ideas, history of science, quark physics, astronomy, etc. Practical for many years in various process industries such as steel mills, coking plants, fertilizer plants, oxygen plants, ammonia plants, explosives production, etc. Also taught for many years at various schools such as primary schools, folk high schools and high schools in subjects such as mathematics, chemistry and physics. He has also had professors and Nobel laureates in physics and plasma physics by his side, all the time both spiritually and concretely. They have taught him what was wrong with the standard theory of what actually happens on the sun. The basic ideas and theories come mainly from this long time of experience and knowledge from teaching, personal study and in the process industry; the last 20 years before retirement at Norsk Hydro. He thus has personal experience of the type of process he proposes here and its basic ingredients. So he knows it will work. The problem is "only" that some institute, university or other interested party wants to take it upon themselves to test and try. Why then has the usual profession not come up with this solution? Doctors and professors in atomic physics and nuclear physics should know, right? The answer is that my solution and its theory are not and have never been part of their education. They don't even know that they lack the required skills. They just believe the over 100-year-old hypotheses about how our sun and the other stars' fusion processes work. The author promises that within a year or two our need for oil, coal, natural gas and conventional nuclear power, and thus the energy crisis and the climate crisis, may be over. If his theory is carefully tested, tried and implemented.