M K Martin
All but unreadable on a mobile phone. This version is awful to read because of all the transcription errors, typos, and poor layout. The bilingual text makes things even harder.
A Google user
>There are some things that you should be able to do on your own property and shouldn't on others. Possessions should be kept.
>I agree that the rise of the proletariat should happen, as well as the homogenization of a term. But when it comes to the measures that Engels and Marx gives, well....they're just wrong. History has taught that communism should not be run through the state nor enforced.
>It is basically calling to get rid of any economic differences by all means necessary.
>Interesting topics of debate—Right of inheritance—Application of rents of land to public purposes.
>It seems like a lot of the negatives and positives of this ideology could be fixed by a direct democracy. It mentions the "battle of democracy" (which is a great phrase), but it just focuses on getting rid of wealth. Lawl, it seems petty.
>It says the bourgeois and proletariat have been around since "civilization" started, most revolutions is just the displacing of the bourgeois for the conquerors.
>They want to appropriate material products, but these material products do not derive from one class over another.
>It's also important to note the relation between the Progressive movement and the ideology expressed in this book.
This is a real source of the Communist Manifesto so five stars.