Steve Agnew
This book is a very interesting read on the nature and problems of academic science in astronomy and astrophysics and particle physics. The basic thesis is that science as a method for truth is in decline and the resources that civilization provides science are being squandered on an overly orthodox scientaucracy. The book is a little disparaging, but it is nevertheless thought provoking. Unfortunately, this book has more despair than hope, more disillusionment than faith, and more fatalism instead of a chosen destiny. The author does not provide any quantitative metric to support the thesis, just anecdotes, but it is true that the current system of science is unfair and much too orthodox and you know, those are very good and valid points. The proposed solution is to have some kind of über bürokratie of really smart but otherwise fair people who would then be enlightened to permit more heterodoxy...really? Another scientaucracy will somehow correct all of the wrongs of the prevailing scientaucracy? By what measure? Since the author presents no measure of success, this hardly seems like a solution...just like more of the same problem.