Protesting Affirmative Action: The Struggle over Equality after the Civil Rights Revolution

¡ JHU Press
āĻ‡-āĻŦā§āĻ•
296
āĻĒā§ƒāĻˇā§āĻ āĻž
āĻ‰āĻĒāĻ¯ā§āĻ•ā§āĻ¤

āĻāĻ‡ āĻ‡-āĻŦā§āĻ•ā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§Ÿā§‡

A lightning rod for liberal and conservative opposition alike, affirmative action has proved one of the more divisive issues in the United States over the past five decades. Dennis Deslippe here offers a thoughtful study of early opposition to the nation’s race- and gender-sensitive hiring and promotion programs in higher education and the workplace.

This story begins more than fifteen years before the 1978 landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. Partisans attacked affirmative action almost immediately after it first appeared in the 1960s. Liberals in the opposition movement played an especially significant role. While not completely against the initiative, liberal opponents strove for “soft” affirmative action (recruitment, financial aid, remedial programs) and against “hard” affirmative action (numerical goals, quotas). In the process of balancing ideals of race and gender equality with competing notions of colorblindness and meritocracy, they even borrowed the language of the civil rights era to make far-reaching claims about equality, justice, and citizenship in their anti–affirmative action rhetoric.

Deslippe traces this conflict through compelling case studies of real people and real jobs. He asks what the introduction of affirmative action meant to the careers and livelihoods of Seattle steelworkers, New York asbestos handlers, St. Louis firemen, Detroit policemen, City University of New York academics, and admissions counselors at the University of Washington Law School. Through their experiences, Deslippe examines the diverse reactions to affirmative action, concluding that workers had legitimate grievances against its hiring and promotion practices.

In studying this phenomenon, Deslippe deepens our understanding of American democracy and neoconservatism in the late twentieth century and shows how the liberals’ often contradictory positions of the 1960s and 1970s reflect the conflicted views about affirmative action many Americans still hold today.

āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ–āĻ• āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ•ā§‡

Dennis Deslippe is an associate professor of American studies at Franklin & Marshall College and author of Rights, Not Roses: Unions and the Rise of Working-Class Feminism, 1945–80.

āĻ‡-āĻŦā§āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ°ā§‡āĻŸāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¨

āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤āĻžāĻŽāĻ¤ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻĒāĻ āĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻĨā§āĻ¯

āĻ¸ā§āĻŽāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻŸāĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻŸā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻŸ
Android āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ iPad/iPhone āĻāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ Google Play āĻŦāĻ‡ āĻ…ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒ āĻ‡āĻ¨āĻ¸ā§āĻŸāĻ˛ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻāĻŸāĻŋ āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ…ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻ‰āĻ¨ā§āĻŸā§‡āĻ° āĻ¸āĻžāĻĨā§‡ āĻ…āĻŸā§‹āĻŽā§‡āĻŸāĻŋāĻ• āĻ¸āĻŋāĻ™ā§āĻ• āĻšā§Ÿ āĻ“ āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ…āĻ¨āĻ˛āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻž āĻ…āĻĢāĻ˛āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‡ āĻĨāĻžāĻ•ā§āĻ¨ āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĒā§œāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻĻā§‡ā§ŸāĨ¤
āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒāĻŸāĻĒ āĻ“ āĻ•āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻ‰āĻŸāĻžāĻ°
Google Play āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻ…āĻĄāĻŋāĻ“āĻŦā§āĻ• āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ•āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻ‰āĻŸāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻ“ā§Ÿā§‡āĻŦ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ‰āĻœāĻžāĻ°ā§‡ āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤
eReader āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĄāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¸
Kobo eReaders-āĻāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤ā§‹ e-ink āĻĄāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¸ā§‡ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻ¤ā§‡, āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻāĻ•āĻŸāĻŋ āĻĢāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛ āĻĄāĻžāĻ‰āĻ¨āĻ˛ā§‹āĻĄ āĻ“ āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻĄāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ‡āĻ¸ā§‡ āĻŸā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¸āĻĢāĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšāĻžāĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§€āĻ° āĻ‰āĻĻā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļā§āĻ¯ā§‡ āĻ¤ā§ˆāĻ°āĻŋ āĻ¸āĻšāĻžā§ŸāĻ¤āĻž āĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻĻā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻž āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļāĻžāĻŦāĻ˛ā§€ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¸āĻ°āĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ¸āĻŦ eReader-āĻ āĻĢāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻž āĻ¯āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻŸā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¸āĻĢāĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¨āĨ¤