Swift as Nemesis: Modernity and Its Satirist

¡ Stanford University Press
āļ‰-āļ´āˇœāļ­
242
āļ´āˇ’āļ§āˇ”
āˇƒāˇ”āļ¯āˇ”āˇƒāˇ”āļšāļ¸āˇŠ āļŊāļļāļēāˇ’

āļ¸āˇ™āļ¸ āļ‰-āļ´āˇœāļ­ āļœāˇāļą

With much of the intellectual discourse of the last several decades concerned with reconsiderations of modernity, how do we read the works of Jonathan Swift, who ridiculed the modern even as it was taking shape? The author approaches the question of modernity in Swift by way of a theory of satire from Aristotle via Swift (and Bakhtin) that eschews modern notions that satire is meant to reform and correct. Linking satire to Nemesis, the goddess of righteous vengeance, "Swift as Nemesis" develops new readings of Swift's major satires.
From his first published work, Swift associates the modern with the new science and represents modernity as a pernicious strain of narcissism that devalues humanistic discourse. In his early satires, he compiles a profane history of the modern in which the new philosophy is an extension of the methodology of alchemists, the debased Roman Catholic Church, and the various Puritan sects. This history culminates in "A Tale of a Tub" with an assault on the intellectual basis of that most formidable of all modern works, Newton's "Principia."
In "Gulliver's Travels," Swift attacks modern culture while aiming at individual readers. Novelistic identification with Gulliver's narcissism (beginning with masturbation and encompassing various scatological observations) implicates readers in the larger cultural critique in which Gulliver, paralleling Narcissus, rejects cultures he encounters until he embraces a cultural image that destroys him. The wider cultural implications of Swift's work are evident in the way he uses travel as a metaphor to link the inhuman consequences of European imperialism with the discoveries of the new science.
Finally, Swift's works, like the mirror Nemesis uses to destroy Narcissus, are shown to return the narcissistic projections of critics. Recognizing that Narcissus and Echo have become important to the critique of modernism, the author argues that readers will find it useful now to turn to the contextualizing role of Nemesis. She emerges from Swift's critically irreducible satire with an ironic claim on modernity itself.

āļšāļģāˇŠāļ­āˇ˜ āļ´āˇ’āˇ…āˇ’āļļāļŗ

Frank T. Boyle is Assistant Professor of English at Fordham University.

āļ¸āˇ™āļ¸ āļ‰-āļ´āˇœāļ­ āļ…āļœāļēāļąāˇŠāļą

āļ”āļļ āˇƒāˇ’āļ­āļą āļ¯āˇ™āļē āļ…āļ´āļ§ āļšāˇ’āļēāļąāˇŠāļą.

āļšāˇ’āļēāˇ€āˇ“āļ¸āˇš āļ­āˇœāļģāļ­āˇ”āļģāˇ”

āˇƒāˇŠāļ¸āˇāļģāˇŠāļ§āˇŠ āļ¯āˇ”āļģāļšāļŽāļą āˇƒāˇ„ āļ§āˇāļļāˇŠāļŊāļ§āˇŠ
Android āˇƒāˇ„ iPad/iPhone āˇƒāļŗāˇ„āˇ Google Play āļ´āˇœāļ­āˇŠ āļēāˇ™āļ¯āˇ”āļ¸ āˇƒāˇŠāļŽāˇāļ´āļąāļē āļšāļģāļąāˇŠāļą. āļ‘āļē āļ”āļļāˇš āļœāˇ’āļĢāˇ”āļ¸ āˇƒāļ¸āļŸ āˇƒāˇŠāˇ€āļēāļ‚āļšāˇŠâ€āļģāˇ“āļēāˇ€ āˇƒāļ¸āļ¸āˇ”āˇ„āˇ”āļģāˇŠāļ­ āļšāļģāļą āļ…āļ­āļģ āļ”āļļāļ§ āļ•āļąāˇ‘āļ¸ āļ­āˇāļąāļš āˇƒāˇ’āļ§ āˇƒāļļāˇāļŗāˇ’āˇ€ āˇ„āˇ āļąāˇœāļļāˇāļŗāˇ’āˇ€ āļšāˇ’āļēāˇ€āˇ“āļ¸āļ§ āļ‰āļŠ āˇƒāļŊāˇƒāļēāˇ’.
āļŊāˇāļ´āˇŠāļ§āˇœāļ´āˇŠ āˇƒāˇ„ āļ´āļģāˇ’āļœāļĢāļš
āļ”āļļāļ§ āļ”āļļāˇš āļ´āļģāˇ’āļœāļĢāļšāļēāˇš āˇ€āˇ™āļļāˇŠ āļļāˇŠâ€āļģāˇ€āˇŠāˇƒāļģāļē āļˇāˇāˇ€āˇ’āļ­āļēāˇ™āļąāˇŠ Google Play āļ¸āļ­ āļ¸āˇ’āļŊāļ¯āˇ“ āļœāļ­āˇŠ āˇāˇŠâ€āļģāˇ€āˇŠâ€āļēāļ´āˇœāļ­āˇŠāˇ€āļŊāļ§ āˇƒāˇ€āļąāˇŠ āļ¯āˇ’āļē āˇ„āˇāļš.
eReaders āˇƒāˇ„ āˇ€āˇ™āļąāļ­āˇŠ āļ‹āļ´āˇāļ‚āļœ
Kobo eReaders āˇ€āˇāļąāˇ’ e-ink āļ‹āļ´āˇāļ‚āļœ āļ´āˇ’āˇ…āˇ’āļļāļŗ āļšāˇ’āļēāˇ€āˇ“āļ¸āļ§, āļ”āļļ āˇ€āˇ’āˇƒāˇ’āļąāˇŠ āļœāˇœāļąāˇ”āˇ€āļšāˇŠ āļļāˇāļœāˇ™āļą āļ”āļļāˇš āļ‹āļ´āˇāļ‚āļœāļēāļ§ āļ‘āļē āļ¸āˇāļģāˇ” āļšāˇ’āļģāˇ“āļ¸ āˇƒāˇ’āļ¯āˇ” āļšāˇ… āļēāˇ”āļ­āˇ” āˇ€āˇš. āļ†āļ°āˇāļģāļšāļģāˇ” āļ‰-āļšāˇ’āļēāˇ€āļąāļēāļ§ āļœāˇœāļąāˇ” āļ¸āˇāļģāˇ” āļšāˇ’āļģāˇ“āļ¸āļ§ āˇ€āˇ’āˇƒāˇŠāļ­āļģāˇāļ­āˇŠāļ¸āļš āļ‹āļ¯āˇ€āˇ” āļ¸āļ°āˇŠâ€āļēāˇƒāˇŠāļŽāˇāļą āļ‹āļ´āļ¯āˇ™āˇƒāˇŠ āļ…āļąāˇ”āļœāļ¸āļąāļē āļšāļģāļąāˇŠāļą.