เกี่ยวกับ eBook เล่มนี้
Lucas treats Whitehead within the framework of major themes in current Anglo-American "analytic" philosophy, viewed against the backdrop of significant historical trends in European and American thought since the Enlightenment. This most misunderstood of twentieth-century philosophers is critically interpreted here.
Whitehead had developed 50 years ago some ideas only now emerging in analytic philosophy. Lucas examines the significance of Whitehead's thought for current epistemology of science, for the anti-foundationalism debate, and more generally, for modal logic, action, theory, philosophical psychology, and the philosophy of mind. He shows how some recent analytic philosophy is now developing ideas concerning language, personal identity, and other topics that are found in Whitehead.
Lucas concludes with recent problems in relativity theory and quantum mechanics, indicating how these bear on the philosophy of science and on the task of forging a comprehensive understanding of nature. He examines the debates concerning Einstein and Whitehead on relativity and analyzes the work of Bohm, Prigogine, and others who have found Whitehead's categories useful for their own success.
Whitehead is shown to be a historical figure of great importance, not an idiosyncratic thinker, isolated along with a few enthusiastic followers from the mainstream of contemporary philosophy. With Russell, Whitehead participated in the same philosophical world that gave rise to analytic philosophy.
Whitehead had developed 50 years ago some ideas only now emerging in analytic philosophy. Lucas examines the significance of Whitehead's thought for current epistemology of science, for the anti-foundationalism debate, and more generally, for modal logic, action, theory, philosophical psychology, and the philosophy of mind. He shows how some recent analytic philosophy is now developing ideas concerning language, personal identity, and other topics that are found in Whitehead.
Lucas concludes with recent problems in relativity theory and quantum mechanics, indicating how these bear on the philosophy of science and on the task of forging a comprehensive understanding of nature. He examines the debates concerning Einstein and Whitehead on relativity and analyzes the work of Bohm, Prigogine, and others who have found Whitehead's categories useful for their own success.
Whitehead is shown to be a historical figure of great importance, not an idiosyncratic thinker, isolated along with a few enthusiastic followers from the mainstream of contemporary philosophy. With Russell, Whitehead participated in the same philosophical world that gave rise to analytic philosophy.
เกี่ยวกับผู้แต่ง
George R. Lucas, Jr., is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Clemson University in South Carolina.
ให้คะแนน eBook นี้
แสดงความเห็นของคุณให้เรารับรู้
ข้อมูลในการอ่าน
สมาร์ทโฟนและแท็บเล็ต
ติดตั้งแอป Google Play Books สำหรับ Android และ iPad/iPhone แอปจะซิงค์โดยอัตโนมัติกับบัญชีของคุณ และช่วยให้คุณอ่านแบบออนไลน์หรือออฟไลน์ได้ทุกที่
แล็ปท็อปและคอมพิวเตอร์
คุณฟังหนังสือเสียงที่ซื้อจาก Google Play โดยใช้เว็บเบราว์เซอร์ในคอมพิวเตอร์ได้
eReader และอุปกรณ์อื่นๆ
หากต้องการอ่านบนอุปกรณ์ e-ink เช่น Kobo eReader คุณจะต้องดาวน์โหลดและโอนไฟล์ไปยังอุปกรณ์ของคุณ โปรดทำตามวิธีการอย่างละเอียดในศูนย์ช่วยเหลือเพื่อโอนไฟล์ไปยัง eReader ที่รองรับ
