Ritesh Nair
The book is a very good discussion on Einstein's Theory of Relativity. It is essentially a compilation of essays on the theory by appropriately qualified people from different regions. Limited by rules restricting each easy to a certain amount of words (3000), the essayists make a good job of attempting to explain the theory in as simple a language as possible. However, the introduction to the essays by the editor itself is long drawn-out and one wants to get to the essays.
9 people found this review helpful
Upaydro6 d
Equations are completely falsified, and seem made up. Total fabrication of evidence to support his "theories", more like just throwing random numbers into his ongoing into real equations to make his own lies seem like truths. He's a fake, and a liar. Gravity just can't be proven to exist, its all a lie, density and electromagnetism rule the universe..
Joseph Wimsatt (Joey)
I do find errors the thinking process of the writer, and the editor. The book is enlightening for the novice of this subject, as outdated as it is. The dismissal of ether is now inaccurate because of the recent discovery of the higgs field( ether). And both author and editor get confused about dimensions past the first three, which is entirely forgivable, not, however, directly after defining the concept. This error may lead some in the wrong direction of conceptualizing the subject. Use your own logic.
1 person found this review helpful