A Google user
daviding says: F. A. Hayek and Ludwig von Bertalanffy were contemporaries, and exchanged correspondence. Caldwell writes ...
"Degrees of Explanation" is also significant because, when Hayek illustrates his claims about sciences that study complex phenomena, he chooses, not economics, but the theory of evolution as his exemplar. In doing so, he links evolutionary theory directly to his earlier ideas about "explanations of the principle": "The most familiar instance in the natural sciences of this sort of mere 'explanation of the principle' is probably provided by the theory of evolution by natural selection of different organisms" (Hayek [1955] 1967a, 11-12). Nearly the exact same sentence appears in the "Within Systems" paper. So, in unpublished pieces in the early 1950s, then in published work a few years later, Hayek was identifying evolutionary theory as yet another example of a scientific theory that attempts to explain complex phenomena. [p. 302]
Like Weaver before him, however, Hayek emphasizes that evolutionary theory is only one of many such theories. In the conclusion of his paper, he states that a variety of other fields also employ "explanations of the principle": "As the advance of the sciences penetrates further and further into more complex phenomena, theories which merely provide explanations of the principle, or which merely describe a range of phenomena which certain types of structures are able to produce, may become more the rule than the exception. Certain developments of recent years, such as cybernetics, the theory of automata or machines, general systems theory, and perhaps also communication theory, seem to belong to this kind" ([1955] 1967a, 20). "Theory of automata" refers to von Neumann's work, and "communication theory" probably refers to Hayek's own "Within Systems" paper (note the qualifier: "perhaps also communications theory). "Cybernetics," popularized by Norbert Weiner, was a theory that attempted to analyze the dynamic properties of all manner of systems, both living and nonliving, using such notions as "homeostatis" (an equilibrium arnong the various parts of a system) and "negative feedback" (where adaptations to chanaes in the environment are made). "General systems theory," devcloped in part by the biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy, who read The Sensory Order when it was in manuscript form, took these trends to their logical conclusion, seeking (as the term implies) a general theory of systems. By the mid-1950s, Hayek was increasingly citing those who sought new tools for analyzing complex systems. His interest would only deepen with the passage of time. [pp. 302-303]