Spider-Man 3

2007年 • 139 分鐘
3.9
3.04K 則評論
63%
Tomatometer
PG-13
內容分級
符合資格
透過網絡瀏覽器或在支援的裝置上觀看瞭解詳情
你的語言沒有適用的配音或字幕。本片只提供英文字幕。

關於這部電影

New York City is in the throes of Spider-mania, and Peter Parker finally has the girl of his dreams. But just when it seems like things can't get any better, Spider-Man must fight the most terrifying trio of villains he's ever encountered—the deadly Sandman, the New Goblin, and Venom—plus the enemy he discovers within himself.
分級
PG-13

評分和評論

3.9
3.04K 則評論
Lake Cooper
2018年11月3日
Anybody who likes this movie has no clue how venom is REALLY supposed to be. He's supposed to be BIG, BAD ASS, and TERRRRRRIFYING. This makes him a skinny little twerp, with cheesey lines & TERRIBLE acting. This whole trilogy sucks. The only two things they ever got right were Doc Oc and Sandman....otherwise, BURN IT. Give me Tom Holland and Iron Man. THAT is a Spidey flick!!!!
46 人認為這篇評論有用
此評論對你有幫助嗎?
Steve Marsh
2015年5月14日
Real let down. Spiderman's random issues were dumb, love stops his mutation, and vemon makes him a Gothic nerd.. Still think the astronaut from the first one, Mary runs from the wedding, son of newspaper man, should have been venom, plot would have been better. Maybe should have given Spiderman just a villain to deal with instead of personality disorders. Sandman side story was cheesy, just be a crook. And the son of Osborne could have been Hob goblin.
47 人認為這篇評論有用
此評論對你有幫助嗎?
Adam Johnson
2022年8月16日
While the Editor's Cut is bit better, I've also learned to appreciate Spider-Man 3 for what it was at the time when it was released. I still think that the movie's biggest problem is that Venom was not supposed to be in here to begin with. And the fact that Sony shoehorned him in and would use the character as a marketing stunt to promote the film is crazy. Even if he's going to be in here, they should've dedicated more of their time with the actual story and have him potrayed correctly.
此評論對你有幫助嗎?

為這部電影評分

請分享你的寶貴意見。