
JoKer
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
I bought premium (which you can do for less than a dollar) which shows you the profiles of people rating your images. Turns out majority of these people just do not exist. The pictures of them make it very obvious. Majority of images here are rather low quality but the "people" rating me have very high quality images (which you can find on Google images), and they all have forename and surname which is unnatural for someone's username. Also the names don't match the images, its clearly fake.
20 people found this review helpful
Antons Temerbekovs
January 21, 2024
Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee the authenticity of all uploaded photos. We are actively working to enhance our platform's features to address this concern and create a safer environment for users. We appreciate your understanding as we strive to make improvements. To ensure photo accuracy, we have implemented a user verification system.

A Google user
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
Seems pretty decent, it would be nice to have some form of verifier for your photos as I saw some on there that I knew weren't legit and I'm sure there were some I didn't recognize. Ad after every 10 ratings, which feels a bit too frequent. Maybe every 20 would be less fatiguing. Other than that it works as advertised.
29 people found this review helpful
Antons Temerbekovs
April 25, 2020
Thanks for your feedback. You can report a photo inside the app by clicking the icon in the upper right corner next to the Menu. We will definitely respond to your complaint and check the photo manually. Also, Ads now appears after every 15 ratings

Max Khovanski
The ratings are highly inflated at the low end and sightly deflated at the top. The ratings NEVER go below 5.0, even if the picture is that of the opposite gender; moreover, unless the subject is significantly below average in appearance, the rating will never dip below 6.0, either. And it will never go beyond 8.0, too, no matter how attractive the subject is. So the difference between a literal model and a below-average subject is 1-2 points. This is completely useless.
23 people found this review helpful