
Will W
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
The app itself functions fine and makes sense, but a lot of the basic features have been put behind a paywall, and are not worth the subscription cost. One silly example is the year in review that a lot of apps are doing now. You cannot see who your best partner or rival were without paying. I wouldn't even use this app if it weren't attached to ratings, just another cash grab. Don't pay for premium.

Dave Hathcock
This app is borderline unusable. It doesn't register touches correctly at all which is just compounded by the number of repeated premium ads that show up. By repeated, I mean that I swipe back to get rid of it (I can't even see an x button most of the time, not that it would track correctly) but then the ad just re appears as if to ask me again if I'm certain I don't want their premium blah. I feel like I should be getting paid for alpha testing. Not a good look for an official app!
1 person found this review helpful

Randall Moore
The new algorithm is ridiculous. Ratings now are far more inaccurate than they used to be years ago. They do not reflect a players level of play consistently, nor do they accurately correlate player performance with established standards. Player ratings can jump an entire dupr level in a couple of games. Player's abilities do not jump like that. The algorithm needs to take into account how long a player has been at a level. In chess ratings, non-provisional ratings don't spike up or down.
6 people found this review helpful