
Jeff Doty
Good interface, weak bidding. the mechanics of the game are good. however, the game is not very much fun for two main reasons. First, the number of five and six-point hands you are dealt is ridiculously high. You don't learn anything from getting hammered every time with a non-biddable hand. Secondly, the partner–robot in this game is an idiot, that wants to jump to a 5 bid of the suit being bid. Makes the game more annoying than fun.

Bradley Miller
Coppercod is the best of all the developers of classic card games. I have been playing bridge and spades for a year now, the AI.is fairly good, neural play is probably more developed in terms of computer play but I don't like neural play.as much, its stressful on my mind. The recent update miffed me some, the opponents cards are now stacked on the sides of the screen. They used to be laid out in a single row. This should be an option in the settings.
1 person found this review helpful

Makenna Johnson
I like the format, however it doesn't specifically explain points earned by a teaching method. It doesn't show you in game, at the scoring, why you earned those points depending on whether you're the defender or not or how much your team bid. I would like an example during scoring, like some other card game apps, so that I could learn the scoring better and become a better bridge player.
7 people found this review helpful