
Rachel Massaglia
The 2.0 version wasn't good, but 3.0 is actually worse. Considering I have to use it, you'd think it would be functional on the most basic features. For example, when choosing activities, the list automatically scrolls back to the top after every selection made. The login page is always buggy. The option of biometrics is great, but it never works.
4 people found this review helpful

Viv S
incredibly laggy, refuses to accept that I don't want to enable biometric login (also won't utilize it if I cave and say yes) so that pops up EVERY time I log in, and the text for activities and observations are smaller than on the 2.0 app, with no space between, making it difficult to see and check. Logging in/out takes about 3 minutes now, whereas it was about 30 seconds in the 2.0 app last week.
7 people found this review helpful

David
Why was this made? 3.0 is multiple times slower and significantly uglier than 2.0. 2.0 worked fine and I've never had an issue with it. I have encountered numerous bugs with 3.0. Most notably, you can no longer paste in the password field, so if you have a password stored in a password manager, then you're out of luck. The world would instantly become better if this just stopped existing.
5 people found this review helpful