Virginia Hanley
After reading the authors notes I was surprised that the film came first. I found that the book got a little bogged down in places as if two people were writing the book. I turned the page expecting the next paragraph, and it was finished. To say I was disappointed would be an understatement. However the general content was well worth a read if you haven't seen the film. So therefore I only knock off one star. Whereas it would have been two.
12 people found this review helpful
Donald A. Hadden
Carl Sagan is a good writer, but not a good novelist. Contact suffers from many novels that set out to make a social/political/cultural point. Not thematic, but making a statement. In this case, the point is that the universe is very big and there simply must be other intelligent species out there. As Sagan said somewhere else, if there isn’t then it’s a big waste of space. The characters are wooden and the plot fairly predictable. The whole narrative about Ellie and her daddy issues is neither
Zubin Gulati
Google Play Store is filled with ZioNazi search results disparaging this intelligent human, Carl Sagan, and Google Play Store is filled with no such bias against Stephen Hawking, who in his audio essays dreams of being "Master" of the "Uni" verse. Carl Sagan's more sagacious MultiVerse Cosmos is more likely, which like Stephen Hawking's femtometer long genetic anomaly, will not necessarily "OBEY" even an infinitesimal of human command or desire, ask every pilot or astronaut who's been dosed with carcinogenic rays and more, but like Carl's Rosetta Stone carrying shielded DNA to Exosolar JPL missions, MAY, harbor Island MultiVerses conducive to interdimensional intelligent Life, Liberty and Love, not Death, Slavery and Destruction.
4 people found this review helpful